As I reflect upon this course, I am surprised by what I have learned and accomplished in such a short period of time. I have moved from a more simplistic view of how people learn to a deeper understanding of how this is accomplished. This paper is a reflection of what I have learned and how I will use this information in the future as an instructional designer.
This course has exposed me to several learning theories and learning styles. At the completion of this course, what I find most shocking is that, even with all of the research on the subject, we still do not know how to effectively reach all students with one approach. All individuals have various learning styles and learning needs. One theory cannot explain how all humans process information. For this reason, I understand that to reach the greatest number of individuals, we should incorporate multiple learning theories and styles. As Bill Kerr (2007) discussed in his blog, we should take the best from each philosophy. All students do not learn the same way. For this reason, we should not expect one approach to reach everyone. With that being said, I am still surprised we have not found an approach that optimizes learning for all.
This course has also deepened my understanding of my own learning. Gilbert and Swanier (2008) discussed how students’ learning styles may fluctuate across concepts and lessons. Master’s level education requires a deeper, more complex type of learning and understanding. Therefore, my current learning needs are best met with the connectivist learning theory. According to the connectivist learning theory, learning occurs at the intersection of prior knowledge, experience, perception, reality, comprehension, and flexibility (Edmunds & Kelly-Bateman, 2008). My current degree path is designed to enhance and improve upon previous experiences.
With the multiple advancements in educational technology, learning styles and learning theories adapt to the changing environment. The Horizon Project is an “ongoing research project designed to identify and describe emerging technologies likely to have an impact on learning, teaching and creative inquiry in education” (NMC, 2014). Students are becoming increasingly savvier when it comes to technology and education. Therefore, it is the expectation that schools incorporate these advancements into curriculum and remain up-to-date with technology.
This course has provided me with a strong base to build and design an effective curriculum for nursing students. We were exposed to various learning styles and learning theories throughout the semester. Although I will not be a traditional educator, these philosophies are applicable to all students. I hope to identify individual needs of my students and create an optimal learning environment for all that I teach.
After completing this course, I can say that I know have a greater arsenal for teaching student nurses. I understand the importance of knowing my students and keeping my learners motivated. It is important to know why people learn the way they do, in order to provide them with the best possible education!
References
Davis, C., Edmunds, E., & Kelly-Bateman, V. (2008). Connectivism. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Connectivism
Gilbert, J.E. & Swanier, C.A. (2008). Learning styles: How do they fluctuate? Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1, 29-40.
Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms as filter, not blinker. [Web log comment]. Retrieved from: http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html
New Media Consortium (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Retrieved from: http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2014-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN-SC.pdf
